Printer-friendly version2004 Election
Ballot Evidence Proves 2004 OH Election Fraud
Investigator Richard Hayes Phillips' evidentiary declaration in the lawsuit King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association, et al. vs. Kenneth Blackwell: 18 pages of evidence of ballot manipulation in 11 Ohio counties, based on direct examination of the actual ballots.
Click here to display PDF file
http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/files/Declaration_of_Richard_Haye...
»
2008 and 2004 Presidential Exit Poll Discrepancies Compared
Introductory Summation:
In 2008 the exit poll discrepancy was considerably smaller than in 2004, but it was still well outside the margin of error. I won’t calculate an exact number, since we don’t have all the data yet. But it’s safe to say that the difference is very unlikely to be explained by chance alone.The fact that pre-election polls provided an estimate very similar to the exit polls in 2008 (The Obama lead was a little bit less in the pre-election polls, but it was surging upwards in the last couple of days, so probably the two were about equivalent) makes it even more likely that they were both accurate.
So that leaves two possibilities: Exit poll bias (and pre-election poll bias as well) or impaired election integrity – that is, election fraud.
Consequently, EDA undertook an effort yesterday to capture exit poll statistics from all major statewide races (President, Senator, and Governor) prior to “adjustment” of the statistics to match the official election results. (Once the statistics are “adjusted” to match the official election results they are worthless for the purpose of assessing the exit poll discrepancy because the “adjustment” erases the discrepancy.)
"What all this means is that, as in 2004, the Democratic candidate performed much better in exit polls than in the official vote count, and the difference was especially large in critical swing states."
To read the complete article, click here
