Landslide Denied

Major Miscount in 2006 Election: Were 3 Million Votes "Misplaced"?
Read the Full Press Release
(as revised and expanded 7/15/07)

Study the Exit Poll Data

Election Defense Alliance, a national election integrity organization, issued an urgent call today for an investigation into the 2006 election results and a moratorium on deployment of all electronic voting equipment after analysis of national exit polling data indicated a major undercount of Democratic votes and an overcount of Republican votes in congressional races across the country. These findings are an alarming indictment of the American election system in which 80% of voters used electronic voting equipment.

As in 2004, the Exit Poll and the reported election results do not add up. Once again the media reflexively discredited the Exit Poll. But there are several objective yardsticks in the Exit Polls that establish their validity and expose the inaccuracy of the election returns. These findings are detailed in a paper published today on the EDA website.

The Edison-Mitofsky media Exit Poll, posted Election Night on, had a sample base of more than 10,000 voters, and showed Democratic House candidates winning over Republicans by an 11.5 percent margin.

The reported vote count showed Democrats winning by a 7.6 margin, 3.9 percent less than the Exit Poll and far outside the poll’s +/-1% margin of error. This discrepancy entailed at least 3,000,000 votes.

The Exit Poll was then adjusted, by a process known as “forcing,” to match reported election vote totals. The final result, posted at 1:00 p.m. November 8, showed Democrats winning by a 7.6 percent margin, exactly mirroring the reported vote totals.

One objective yardstick was the proportion of respondents who indicated they had voted for Bush or Kerry in 2004. The sample in the already weighted Election Night Exit Poll had 47 percent Bush voters and 45 percent Kerry voters, a valid sample given the very conservative assumption that Republicans and Democrats turned out with equal enthusiasm in 2006. However, after the forcing process, the sample contained 49 percent Bush voters and only 43 percent Kerry supporters. This 6 percent gap is more than twice the size of the 2004 Bush win of 2.8 percent. It indicates a significant over-sampling of Republican voters in the adjusted 2006 Exit Poll. Bush and Congressional approval ratings were among the additional yardsticks confirming this conclusion.

Such a gross oversample of Republicans was necessary to match the actual vote counts, which therefore could not have been an accurate count of the actual electorate. Had the intended votes been accurately tallied, this election would have produced a Democratic landslide of epic proportions.

Read the full report:

Landslide Denied: Exit Polls vs. Vote Count 2006

Election Defense Alliance depends on your support to continue this important work. Please Click to Donate
  • The purpose of EDA is to help build and coordinate a comprehensive, cohesive national strategy for the election integrity movement, in order to regain public control of the voting process in the United States, and to ensure that the process is honest, transparent, secure, subject to unambiguous verification, and worthy of the public trust.
  • To accomplish this purpose, EDA will provide resources, strategic planning and coordination opportunities for a nationwide network of citizen electoral integrity groups and individuals already working at the national, state, and local levels.
  • We invite all citizens and groups who wish to coordinate, collaborate, and share resources for election monitoring, data analysis, and citizen oversight activities to create a log-in account, join a working group, and establish working ties between EDA and your local or regional election integrity organization.


  • Please explore our website and share information found here with your friends, family and fellow activists. You will find many educational materials in our Resources page for reading, listening and viewing.
  • Check the EDA Blog for election integrity news and action alerts, and join other citizens on critical action initiatives at our Take Action page. Feel free to explore further and if you have suggestions for content areas or content, please write to us.


  • The EDA website is a participatory work in progress that any registered user may contribute to. We encourage you to help add, catalog, and share informational resources at this website. See our guide to posting content.
  • Under the "Resources" menu tab you will find a 50 States Directory section with pages for each of the states. We especially encourage registered website account holders to post resources and announcements about their states and counties to these state folders.
  • Our Working Group forums provide additional resources and discussion areas arranged according to tasks and project types. This is the area where registered Working Group members meet virtually to share ideas and collaborate on projects. Each Working Group also has its own dedicated e-mail discussion list. Access to the Working Group forums and lists requires separate registration for Working Groups

Thank you for visiting, and for taking action to restore transparent, honest, and publicly accountable elections in America.


Join Today