Bev Harris, Founder of BlackboxVoting.org
The PEN letter generator enables you to write and send your own letter to three members of the House Committee on Administration, your own Congressional representative, a letter-to-the-editor at one or more daily newspapers in your region, and copies of this action letter to many others--all at the same time!
The letter you will see displayed is for your information only--it is NOT the letter that is sent.
YOU write the letter to be sent by pasting or typing in the textbox in item 3 on the submission form
(scroll past letter to view the form).
This option presents a finished form letter you can modify with drop-in talking points provided. Simply open up a text file or e-mail application in an adjoining window and copy and paste sections of the letter or talking points you would like to use.
Save your finished letter and add addresses listed here.
We urge you to print and FAX your letter to several members of the House Committee on Administration, and to your own Representative. Paper pouring from overheating FAX machines registers a more urgent impression on our public servants. Then give them a ring on the phone!
(Keep the unitary executive OUT of elections)
(The Holt bill permits them)
(The Holt bill extends federal law protection to trade-secret voting software)
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
HR811_FloorManagersAmendment_072707.pdf | 175.72 KB |
Please Forward Widely
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ELECTION DEFENSE ALLIANCE ACTION ALERT:
Halt Holt! Warn Congress to Block HR 811!
H.R. 811: A Clear and Present Danger to Democracy!DO YOU WANT:
We’d ALL like to think that Rush Holt's bill H.R. 811, the “The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act” is a good thing. But just like “The Patriot Act,” “No Child Left Behind,” and the “The Healthy Forests Act,” the name doesn't match the reality.
then why have some big names “signed on” to support H.R. 811?
Well-intentioned groups (such as MoveOn and PFAW)--even a small number of voting activist groups--
have been fooled by the PR spin on the Holt Bill (H.R. 811).
H.R. 811 is being sold as “Banning Paperless Voting,”
but here’s what's hidden in the fine print:
The Holt Bill opens the back door to REQUIRING computers in every polling place,
mandating a new generation of unnecessary, unproven computerized voting technology,
adding more secret software to our elections,
and sending at least another $4 BILLION of our taxpayer money to the electronic voting industry
-and-
HR 811 gives permanent CONTROL over THE NATION'S VOTING EQUIPMENT to the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) -- FOUR WHITE HOUSE APPOINTEES!
http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/Halt811
Click Link Above > See Model Letter > Copy > Paste > Personalize > Print > FAX, Phone, and E-mail to Congress
FAX at least three House Administration Committee Members
FAX your own House Representatives
FAX your Secretary of State
All Contact Information Provided at EDA Halt811 Action Page
Click this Link to Invite Friends to Subscribe for Election Defense Alliance alerts like this one.
For more details on what is DEAD WRONG with HR 811, click here for the EDA 811 Resource Page
http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/hr_811_the_holt_ii_bill_to_amend_hava
For a one-page fact sheet on the dangers of EAC centralized control of federal elections, download
http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/files/WhyTheEACMustBeAbolished.pdf
American democracy depends on every ONE of us and YOU.
Tell our elected representatives that we DO NOT WANT H.R. 811 because we DO WANT meaningful election reform.
True Election Reform Would Preserve and Protect, Not Threaten Our Democratic Traditions!
It’s not too late to get it RIGHT…IF WE ACT TODAY.
This flyer can be downloaded and copied from: http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/EDA_811_email_alert
You can forward this alert directly to others as an e-mail message, if your browser supports a "Send this Page" function; or you can download this page from this link: http://www.electiondefensealliance.org/EDA_811_Alert then copy and paste into a fresh e-mail message and send. The advantage of using this page as an action e-mail is that it conveys live links that enable others to forward and subscribe for future EDA alerts. TAKE QUICK ACTION SUBSCRIBE! SPREAD WORD! ACT! PEN a Letter to Congress and Press State, County Election Officials Oppose H.R. 811 This is a clear and present danger to American democracy. We cannot allow it! Halt H.R. 811!
We'd all like to think that Rush Holt's H.R. 811 bill, The Voter Confidence and Increased Accessibility Act, is a good thing. But just like No Child Left Behind, The Healthy Forests Act, and The Patriot Act, the name doesn't match the reality. Well-intentioned groups such as MoveOn and PFAW--and even some voting activist groups--have been taken in by the Holt "Voter Confidence" spin. They assure us that H.R. 811 will "Ban Paperless Voting," but here's what's hidden in the fine print: H.R. 811 Actually Requires More Computerized Voting! The Holt bill opens a back door to permanent electronic voting in every polling place in America, by mandating a new generation of unnecessary, unproven computerized voting technology, adding more secret software to our elections, and sending at least another $4 billion in taxpayer money to the electronic voting industry.--and-- H.R. 811 Consolidates Executive Control of Elections H.R. 811 gives permanent control over the nation's voting equipment to the Election Assistance Commission (EAC) -- four White House appointees!
CLICK and PICK UP at the Halt 811 Action Page: For more on what's DEAD WRONG with H.R. 811, see EDA 811 Resource Page Thirteen Significant Problems in H.R. 811 by Nancy Tobi HR 811: Ten Blunders in A Deceptive Boondoggle by Bruce O'Dell Critical Annotation of H.R. 811 by Bev Harris and More Join the Election Defense Alliance Mail List Send a Subscription Invitation Now Write, Phone, FAX Congress! To the Honorable: I write in opposition to the Holt Bill, H.R. 811, which promises "increased voter confidence" but actually perpetuates secret vote-counting by computers while handing centralized control of federal elections to four White House appointees. Because it requires a computerized text conversion device in every polling place, H.R. 811 would actually require electronic voting machines, effectively ruling out noncomputerized voting methods such as handcounted paper ballots. For the same reason H.R. 811 would also rule out noncomputerized voter assistive devices that provide better accessiblity features at far less cost, while avoiding the unacceptable risks of secret, computerized vote-counting. This unnecessary, unproven, as-yet nonexistent text converter device that H.R. 811 requires is a gift to the E-voting industry and an under-funded federal mandate that will impose huge cost burdens on the states. . . . read more . . . Then PEN Your Letter to Congress, the Press, and Friends--All at Once! The nation's election administrators are rising to resist Holt. The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) and the National Association of Counties (NACo) issued a joint statement opposing H.R. 811 and the Senate companion bill, S. 559. "This legislation would exacerbate, rather than assist states and counties in addressing these challenges which could lead to disastrous unintended consequences in the 2008 presidential election." Election Defense Alliance is a sponsored project of International Humanities Center, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization.
Warn Congress: H.R. 811 is The Patriot Act of Elections
An Election Deception Too Dangerous for Democracy
April 16, 2007
Quick Links
Forward this e-mail to a friend
Election Defense Alliance | P. O. Box 75005 | Arlington Hts, MA. 02475
(Scroll down)
1. Verifygra election prescription
2. Who do YOU want controlling US elections?
Rep. Zoe Lofgren
Fax: (202) 225-3336
Attachment | Size |
---|---|
Verifygra_FAX_zl.jpg | 100.92 KB |
Cronies_272kb.pdf | 271.02 KB |
How to Contact Your Congressional Representative:
U.S. House "Write Your Representative" guide to mail, E-mail and E-mail Webform communications
http://www.statelocalgov.net/50states-secretary-state.cfm
[* Use the E-mail webform if you find that the standard E-mail address (clickable in the Representative's name) returns a delivery failure message.]
Submit this State and zip code on the webform to gain access: MI 49503-2313
Democrats
|
Republicans
|
Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald CA-37, Chairwoman |
Rep. Vernon J. Ehlers MI-3, Ranking Member |
Rep. Robert A. Brady, PA-1 |
Rep. Dan Lungren, CA-3 |
Rep. Zoe Lofgren, CA-16 |
Rep. Kevin McCarthy, CA-22 |
Rep. Mike Capuano, MA-8 |
|
Rep. Charles Gonzalez, TX-20 |
|
Rep. Susan Davis, CA-53 |
Subcommittee on Elections
Members:
Democrats | Republicans |
Rep.
Zoe Lofgren, CA-16 Subcommittee Chair |
Rep. Kevin McCarthy, CA-22 Subcommittee Ranking Member |
Rep. Juanita Millender-McDonald, CA-37 |
Rep. Vernon J. Ehlers, MI-3 |
Rep. Charles Gonzalez, TX-20 |
|
Rep. Susan Davis, CA-53 |
Participate in Protecting Our Democracy!
Help Amend HR 811 to prohibit "electronic ballots."
This page lists a variety of materials you can use, and actions you can take, to work toward informing Congress and others of the reasons why electronic ballots must be prohibited in the United States -- NOW.
These materials are aimed at amending |
Electronic Voting Does Not Serve the Disabilities Community
Electronic Voting Machines Disenfranchise Minority Voters
Take Action Now! |
||
![]() |
Email Congress to tell them the Holt bill (HR 811) must be amended to ban DREs Electronic voting machines (DRE) are a failed technology that disenfranchises the very taxpayers who pay for them. |
|
![]() |
Call Congress to Ban Electronic Ballots. Let us know who you called. This page lists all the House Members and their phone numbers. We're putting stars by the ones that you let us know you've called. |
|
![]() |
Endorse our proposed amendments to HR 811 Urge Congress to require real paper ballots, marked by voters or by non-tabulating ballot-marking devices. |
|
General Information for Congress and Others |
||
![]() |
A Call for an Amendment to HR 811 to Prohibit Unverifiable “Electronic Ballots” 10-page combination of several handouts on this page, with an annotated Table of Contents. |
|
![]() |
Why the Urgent Need to Ban Electronic Ballots? A bullet list of the many reasons why DREs constitute a new and subtle |
|
![]() |
Election Reform in a High-Tech World - Handout A 2-page standalone explanation of why electronic ballots (electrical charges inside a computer) cannot be safeguarded the way paper ballots can, and how prohibiting the use of electronic ballots will solve practical election problems. |
|
![]() |
The Impact of an HR 811 Amendment to Ban Electronic Ballots A one-page list detailing the practical implications of such an amendment - what the amendment will and will not do. Printable pdf handout |
|
![]() |
A Voter Verified Paper Audit Trail - Not a Reliable Back Up One-page summarizing some evidence of past failures of voter-verifiable paper audit trails to provide a reliable indication of voter intent. |
|
![]() |
Pictorial Handout An illustration of the most important benefit of amending Congressman |
|
Electronic Voting Does Not Serve the Disabilities Community |
||
![]() |
Americans with Disabilities Call for Election Systems Featuring Both Accessibility and Security A statement written by Mr. Noel Runyan, a blind accessibility expert, calling for voting systems that use only paper ballots. As of March 28, signatories include 34 leaders in the disabilities community and more signatures are added every day. |
|
![]() |
Pictorial Handout An illustration of the fact that accessibility for people with disabilities can be achieved without the use of electronic ballot systems. |
|
Electronic Voting Machines Disenfranchise Minority Voters |
||
![]() |
2004 and 2006 New Mexico Canvass Data Shows Undervote Rates Plummet in Minority Precincts When Paper Ballots are Used A report showing that the undervote rate in minority precincts decreased by as much as 85% when the state switched from electronic ballot systems to paper ballots. |
|
![]() |
Electronic Voting Machines: New, High-Tech Ways to Disenfranchise African-Americans 2-pages of evidence that DREs are disproportionately disenfranchising African-American voters. |
To compose your message to Congress, copy and paste the text below into the body of a new text document or e-mail message, and try to put it into your own words. To increase the persuasiveness of your letter, adapt several of the suggested talking points below in your own words. (It's much more effective to not send form letters!)
Send copies to your own Congressional representative and to members of the Committee on House Administration, using the contact information listed here.
We recommend faxing your letters as the most effective means of delivery.
You can fax the chair of the committee this prescription for electoral integrity, too.
I write in opposition to the Holt Bill, H.R. 811, which promises "increased voter confidence" but actually perpetuates secret vote-counting by computers while handing centralized control of federal elections to four White House appointees.
Because it requires a computerized text conversion device in every polling place, H.R. 811 would actually require electronic voting machines, compromising noncomputerized voting methods such as handcounted paper ballots.
For the same reason H.R. 811 would also rule out noncomputerized voter assistive devices that provide better accessiblity features at far less cost, while avoiding the unacceptable risks of secret, computerized vote-counting.
This unnecessary, unproven, as-yet nonexistent text converter device that H.R. 811 requires is a gift to the E-voting industry and an under-funded federal mandate that will impose huge cost burdens on the states.
H.R. 811 provides no means to enforce election laws that are being routinely violated. This hardly inspires "increased voter confidence" in elections.
Election auditing procedures in H.R. 811--which apply to post-election results rather than to the first count--are poorly conceived and inadequate to reliably detect electronic fraud or mistabulation. This inspires alarm, not confidence.
The EAC, created as a temporary advisory commission to implement HAVA, is in fact a federal executive commission that can at any time be converted into a federal regulatory agency by the insertion of a single line of text in any act of Congress.
Regulatory powers would enable the EAC to effectively bypass Congress and create law that preempts Constitutional state sovereignty in election administration. This would allow four White House appointees to determine:
* Which voting systems are approved for use in our elections
* Who counts the votes, and how votes are counted
* How recounts are conducted and outcomes decided
This is a clear and present danger to American democracy. Do not allow it! Reject H.R. 811!
True election reform that ensures, rather than threatens democratic foundations, requires
* Public ownership of any voting system
* Citizen oversight of all electoral processes
* State sovereignty in conducting elections
H.R. 811 is opposed by the National Association of Counties, the National Conference of State Legislatures, and the National Association of Secretaries of State because elections administrators in the 50 states understand the disastrous destabilizing effects H.R. 811 will have on U.S. elections. That's why they say NO to H.R. 811 -- and why you should too.
Sincerely,
If you are writing a letter to the editor (LTE), the usual length limitation is about 250 words. The above letter is 308 words. The longest paragraph is 80 words, and the smallest, about 30. The average line contains 15 words, so subtracting 4 lines would yield a letter that would be within most LTE length limits.
I am especially upset because H.R. 811:
• Entrenches private E-voting vendors that have no business managing public elections
• Despite its backers' claims, H. R. 811 does not eliminate DREs
• Allows election technologies that threaten the secrecy of the ballot
• Perpetuates the pretense of a certification process that cannot possibly assure secure or reliable voting equipment
• Allows election reporting practices that expose election results to Internet manipulation
• Leaves the nation exposed to risk of undetectable, outcome-alterning mass vote fraud and illegitimate government
• Imposes mandates for unnecessary and unproven E-voting equipment at unmet cost to the states
• Sets impossible timelines for implementing complex technical mandates
• Centralizes control of elections under a permanent four-person board appointed by the president
• Erodes state sovereignty as a check on federal government power
• Maintains the unacceptable practice of electronic vote counting, a process inherently secret from the voters